EVIDENCE

Trust begins when the line between fact and interpretation is visible.

The sourcing, citation, and publication system behind every case, claim, graph, and recommendation on this site.

SIX STATEMENT TYPES

Different claims deserve different labels.

F

Source Fact

Directly supported by a cited primary or authoritative source.

S

Market Signal

An observable pattern that may indicate movement but is not proof of cause.

I

Interpretation

My explanation of what the evidence may mean.

A

Assumption

A condition required for the reasoning to hold.

H

Hypothesis

A causal claim designed to be tested and potentially falsified.

R

Recommendation

The decision I would make given the evidence, uncertainty, and trade-offs.

THE EVIDENCE LADDER

Confidence must be earned, not implied.

Conceptual classification — not a statistical score.

01

VERIFIED

Current primary evidence supports the statement and its precise wording.

02

SUPPORTED

Credible evidence exists, but scope, period, attribution, or wording needs final review.

03

HYPOTHESIS

A reasoned claim to test—not a biographical fact or market certainty.

04

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Insufficiently sourced, confidential, legally sensitive, or awaiting permission.

SOURCE & EVIDENCE LEDGER

Every material graph and claim should be traceable.

01

Source

Original publisher, author, dataset, or institutional owner.

02

Date & scope

Publication date, observation period, geography, population, and limitations.

03

Claim supported

The exact statement the source can reasonably support.

04

Evidence status

Verified, Supported, Hypothesis, or Not for Publication.

05

Method note

How the figure or conclusion was constructed; no invented data.

06

URL / DOI

A direct link readers can inspect.

FOUNDATIONAL REFERENCES

Research supporting the decision discipline.

A Scientific Approach to Entrepreneurial Decision Making

Camuffo et al. (2020). A randomized controlled trial on hypothesis-driven entrepreneurial decisions.

Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases

Tversky & Kahneman (1974). A foundational account of recurring bias in judgment under uncertainty.

Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments

Eisenhardt (1989). Evidence on information use, alternatives, and strategic decision speed.

Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning

March (1991). A foundational model for balancing learning and execution.

EDITORIAL COMMITMENTS

What readers can expect.

  • Use primary sources whenever available and date material facts.
  • Separate company outcomes from my direct contribution.
  • State assumptions, uncertainty, and confidence explicitly.
  • Identify what evidence would change the recommendation.
  • Give every data graph a source, period, method note, and accessible link.
  • Correct material errors visibly when stronger evidence emerges.
  • Protect confidential, personal, legal, and third-party information.

Evidence is a product feature.

Credibility compounds when readers can inspect not only the conclusion, but also the limits of the claim.